Payinference
Agent guardrails

Agent control

Agent control puts explicit guardrails in front of agent-initiated payments. Spend limits, scope and provider constraints live in version-controlled policy, and every payment an agent attempts is evaluated against them before it is sent. Permitted payments proceed, and everything else gets a step-up, hold or block.

The problem

Agents can initiate payments; something has to bound them

When software agents initiate payments, the constraints usually live inside the agent itself, the same system you are trying to bound. There is no independent checkpoint that enforces spend limits, scope or provider restrictions before execution, and no record of which constraint stopped which attempt.

How it works

An independent checkpoint outside the agent

  1. 01
    Guardrails live in policy, not in the agent
    Spend, scope and provider constraints are defined in Policy Manager as explicit, version-controlled rules that live outside the system they constrain.
  2. 02
    Every attempt is decided first
    The agent's backend calls POST /v1/decision like any other caller; the attempt is evaluated against the guardrails on the hot path.
  3. 03
    Enforcement before money moves
    Within bounds, the payment proceeds on your stack. Outside them, the instruction is step-up, hold or block, with reason codes naming the matched rules.
  4. 04
    Every attempt on the record
    Decisions and reported outcomes are recorded, so agent payment behaviour is reviewable after the fact.
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about agent control with Payinference.

See all questions