Payinference
Risk

Risk decisions

Risk decisions turn risk signals into an executable instruction. Step-up, hold or block is evaluated against your own thresholds. Scoring runs only on safe payment context such as amount, currency, method and network-level signals. There is no card data, no customer identity and no black-box verdict, and every decision carries reason codes.

The problem

Binary approve-or-decline, decided in the dark

Risk handling is usually either a hard decline or a silent approve, driven by scattered rules or an opaque vendor score nobody can explain. There is no graduated response, no step-up when friction is warranted, no hold when a human should look, and no auditable reason why a payment was treated the way it was.

How it works

Graduated instructions against your thresholds

  1. 01
    Safe context in
    POST /v1/decision carries amount, currency, method and network-level signals. Strict schemas reject card data and customer identity at the boundary.
  2. 02
    Scored against your policy
    The risk engine evaluates the payment against the thresholds you set in policy. Policy is cached on the hot path, so scoring adds no provider calls.
  3. 03
    A graduated instruction back
    Instead of a bare score you get step-up, hold or block, or a routing instruction when risk is acceptable, always with reason codes.
  4. 04
    Prove it in shadow first
    Run shadow mode to see what risk decisions would have been made on real traffic before any of them are enforced.
Powered by

The products behind it

Every solution is the same four-part architecture doing its job. These are the parts doing the heavy lifting here.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about risk decisions with Payinference.

See all questions